Do you think this was very kind of steve rotham?
Q. Dear Ms.(blocked my name) Thank you for contacting me in support of the welfare of exotic cats. I appreciate hearing from you and I welcome the opportunity to respond. Like you, I am concerned to hear that such magnificent creatures are potentially being bread for slaughter. It may interest you to know that I am a strong advocate for the humane treatment of animals. Since I have taken office, I have called for various government agencies to conduct investigations into different allegations of inhumane treatment of animals. I strongly believe that the Animals Welfare Act, which was enacted to protect animals, should be strongly enforced and I will continue to do all that I can to see that this happens. To my knowledge,… [cont.]
Asked by snipe_ahh baby - Tue Nov 3 17:00:59 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yes, I do, I am an animal lover, especially cats. But why would someone breed exotic cats for slaughter? I am glad you brought this to my attention, but is it for the fur that these animals are slaughtered? I guess in the bubble that I live in, I thought this practice was stopped.
Answered by Cassie77 - Fri Nov 6 19:18:48 2009
Q. Dear Ms.(blocked my name) Thank you for contacting me in support of the welfare of exotic cats. I appreciate hearing from you and I welcome the opportunity to respond. Like you, I am concerned to hear that such magnificent creatures are potentially being bread for slaughter. It may interest you to know that I am a strong advocate for the humane treatment of animals. Since I have taken office, I have called for various government agencies to conduct investigations into different allegations of inhumane treatment of animals. I strongly believe that the Animals Welfare Act, which was enacted to protect animals, should be strongly enforced and I will continue to do all that I can to see that this happens. To my knowledge,… [cont.]
Asked by snipe_ahh baby - Tue Nov 3 17:00:59 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yes, I do, I am an animal lover, especially cats. But why would someone breed exotic cats for slaughter? I am glad you brought this to my attention, but is it for the fur that these animals are slaughtered? I guess in the bubble that I live in, I thought this practice was stopped.
Answered by Cassie77 - Fri Nov 6 19:18:48 2009
What do you think 400,000 babies are born in the United States to mothers who are illegal immigrants.?
Q. Each year, an estimated 400,000 babies are born in the United States to mothers who are illegal immigrants. More than 25 percent of those babies are born in California. Although Congress has never passed a law saying so, no president has ever ordered it, and no court has ever ruled on the issue, each of these babies automatically becomes a U.S. citizen when it takes its first breath. That could change if legislation that Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River, joined in sponsoring in April becomes law. Lungren, who served as California's attorney general from 1990 to 1998 and worked on the last successful push for an immigration overhaul when he represented Long Beach in the Congress in the 1980s, said he is trying to stimulate a debate on… [cont.]
Asked by Untied States Of Latina - Mon Sep 10 16:01:19 2007 - - 16 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Maybe a law should be introduce that illegals who have a child here, are not granted US citizenship to the child but the home country of the mother instead; The birth rate would dramatically drop this was the case. As the mother did NOT have the right to be here in the first place. Once the child has reached adult hood they can apply to change their status and become a US citizen We do not need more illegals having kids here, and then leaving them here, like that lady did recently, (I can not remember her name), saying that she was forced to do that by the US. However having a child in the US today does NOT give you the right to US citizenship or the Green card, however many illegals fail to understand or grasp this fact.
Answered by Mama~peapod - Mon Sep 10 16:26:00 2007
Q. Each year, an estimated 400,000 babies are born in the United States to mothers who are illegal immigrants. More than 25 percent of those babies are born in California. Although Congress has never passed a law saying so, no president has ever ordered it, and no court has ever ruled on the issue, each of these babies automatically becomes a U.S. citizen when it takes its first breath. That could change if legislation that Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River, joined in sponsoring in April becomes law. Lungren, who served as California's attorney general from 1990 to 1998 and worked on the last successful push for an immigration overhaul when he represented Long Beach in the Congress in the 1980s, said he is trying to stimulate a debate on… [cont.]
Asked by Untied States Of Latina - Mon Sep 10 16:01:19 2007 - - 16 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Maybe a law should be introduce that illegals who have a child here, are not granted US citizenship to the child but the home country of the mother instead; The birth rate would dramatically drop this was the case. As the mother did NOT have the right to be here in the first place. Once the child has reached adult hood they can apply to change their status and become a US citizen We do not need more illegals having kids here, and then leaving them here, like that lady did recently, (I can not remember her name), saying that she was forced to do that by the US. However having a child in the US today does NOT give you the right to US citizenship or the Green card, however many illegals fail to understand or grasp this fact.
Answered by Mama~peapod - Mon Sep 10 16:26:00 2007
Do you know the Democrats were pushing other important legislation?
Q. HR 918 IH 111th congress 1st Session H. R. 918 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, as the `Stan Lundine Post Office Building'. in the house of representatives february 9, 2009
Asked by Roboron - Tue Feb 10 12:30:16 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Routine stuff. Happens all the time.
Answered by Laser - Tue Feb 10 12:33:29 2009
Q. HR 918 IH 111th congress 1st Session H. R. 918 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 300 East 3rd Street in Jamestown, New York, as the `Stan Lundine Post Office Building'. in the house of representatives february 9, 2009
Asked by Roboron - Tue Feb 10 12:30:16 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Routine stuff. Happens all the time.
Answered by Laser - Tue Feb 10 12:33:29 2009
Do you think our politicians will finally get it right with bill HR 4759 to repeal NAFTA?
Q. 111th CONGRESS, 2d Session H. R. 4759 To provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement. in the house of representatives march 4, 2010 Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. BACA, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. FILNER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARE, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. KAGEN, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. KISSELL, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. MASSA, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. PAUL, Mr. SCHAUER, Mr. visclosky, Mr. WILSON of Ohio, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Mr. STARK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means a bill to provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade… [cont.]
Asked by MR. Thumbs Up - Fri Mar 12 13:52:59 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Nope. Not gonna happen. Like it or not, our government is in Big Business' back pocket, and Big Business is making WAY too much off of cheap Mexican labor to allow this bill to pass. I see it dying in committee.
Answered by angelgolightly - Fri Mar 12 20:17:24 2010
Q. 111th CONGRESS, 2d Session H. R. 4759 To provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement. in the house of representatives march 4, 2010 Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. BACA, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. FILNER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARE, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. KAGEN, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. KISSELL, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. MASSA, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. PAUL, Mr. SCHAUER, Mr. visclosky, Mr. WILSON of Ohio, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Mr. STARK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means a bill to provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade… [cont.]
Asked by MR. Thumbs Up - Fri Mar 12 13:52:59 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Nope. Not gonna happen. Like it or not, our government is in Big Business' back pocket, and Big Business is making WAY too much off of cheap Mexican labor to allow this bill to pass. I see it dying in committee.
Answered by angelgolightly - Fri Mar 12 20:17:24 2010
Why did the Democrats in Congress overwhelmingly deny the introdutcion of the HR-847 "Sunshine Bill"?
Q. Why did they vote down this bill so quickly? H.Res.847 - Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any conference committee or other meetings held to determine the content of national health care legislation be conducted in public under the watchful eye of the people of the United States.
Asked by Touche' - Tue Mar 16 19:16:11 2010 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. Why did they vote down this bill so quickly? H.Res.847 - Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any conference committee or other meetings held to determine the content of national health care legislation be conducted in public under the watchful eye of the people of the United States.
Asked by Touche' - Tue Mar 16 19:16:11 2010 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
Did you hear about H.R. 645 (to establish "emergency" FEMA camps on military installations for Americans)?
Q. 111th congress 1st Session H. R. 645 To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations. in the house of representatives january 22, 2009 Mr. hastings of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned a bill to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the… [cont.]
Asked by dumdum - Wed Jan 28 12:35:02 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Great...now they will in every aspect be exactly like Concentration/gulag camps here in the USA. I take care of my family and home and the government can go back into the hole that they came out of. ever hear of the bill of rights and constitution? people should read it sometime!
Answered by Fedup Veteran - Wed Jan 28 12:50:21 2009
Q. 111th congress 1st Session H. R. 645 To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations. in the house of representatives january 22, 2009 Mr. hastings of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned a bill to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the… [cont.]
Asked by dumdum - Wed Jan 28 12:35:02 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Great...now they will in every aspect be exactly like Concentration/gulag camps here in the USA. I take care of my family and home and the government can go back into the hole that they came out of. ever hear of the bill of rights and constitution? people should read it sometime!
Answered by Fedup Veteran - Wed Jan 28 12:50:21 2009
What is your opinion? And why?
Q. Editor: I have followed the news reports from Gaza with a heavy heart. The escalating violence has created a humanitarian crisis and diminished hope for peace. At a time of hope and renewal in the United States, it is devastating to observe the bloodshed in the Middle East. But peace could be possible if the United States decides to pursue a rapprochement with Iran. Iran, as a major supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, is key to peace in Israel and the Middle East at large. Talks between Iran and the United States are essential to foster a stable region in which Hamas and Israel feel secure enough to lay down their arms and begin peace negotiations. President Obama and the 111th Congress should draw Iran into efforts to foster peace… [cont.]
Asked by Texas Democrat - Mon Jan 26 16:04:10 2009 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I agree it is going to take some intervention from an outside source with a cool head to stop these two from completely destroying each other.
Answered by coffee.taylor - Mon Jan 26 16:15:11 2009
Q. Editor: I have followed the news reports from Gaza with a heavy heart. The escalating violence has created a humanitarian crisis and diminished hope for peace. At a time of hope and renewal in the United States, it is devastating to observe the bloodshed in the Middle East. But peace could be possible if the United States decides to pursue a rapprochement with Iran. Iran, as a major supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, is key to peace in Israel and the Middle East at large. Talks between Iran and the United States are essential to foster a stable region in which Hamas and Israel feel secure enough to lay down their arms and begin peace negotiations. President Obama and the 111th Congress should draw Iran into efforts to foster peace… [cont.]
Asked by Texas Democrat - Mon Jan 26 16:04:10 2009 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I agree it is going to take some intervention from an outside source with a cool head to stop these two from completely destroying each other.
Answered by coffee.taylor - Mon Jan 26 16:15:11 2009
Can anyone explain this?
Q. 111th Congress, 1st session, House vote 880 HRES 877 (Roll # 880) Expressing support for Chinese Human Rights Activists Huang Qi and Tan Zuoren for Engaging in Peaceful Expression As They Seek Answers and Justice for the Parents Whose Children were killed in the Sichuan Earthquake on May 12, 2008. Two thirds majority of those present and voting is required for approval or passage. Used for suspension calendar bills in the House and certain Senate votes. Passed by 426-1 with 7 not voting. Why is the United States Government involved in what goes on in China? Does this mean that China votes on what is going on in the U S? Are we still paying the Congressmen and women to take care of US business? Or is China and other countries paying… [cont.]
Asked by barn - Tue Nov 10 06:44:29 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Agreed. Vote the bums out! This meaningless bill probably has a bunch of earmarks that has everything to do with supporting pet projects that get these bums reelected. China's people don't vote on anything. We should stop importing their products. How can American companies compete with a coerced workforce?
Answered by Ransom - Tue Nov 10 06:57:26 2009
Q. 111th Congress, 1st session, House vote 880 HRES 877 (Roll # 880) Expressing support for Chinese Human Rights Activists Huang Qi and Tan Zuoren for Engaging in Peaceful Expression As They Seek Answers and Justice for the Parents Whose Children were killed in the Sichuan Earthquake on May 12, 2008. Two thirds majority of those present and voting is required for approval or passage. Used for suspension calendar bills in the House and certain Senate votes. Passed by 426-1 with 7 not voting. Why is the United States Government involved in what goes on in China? Does this mean that China votes on what is going on in the U S? Are we still paying the Congressmen and women to take care of US business? Or is China and other countries paying… [cont.]
Asked by barn - Tue Nov 10 06:44:29 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Agreed. Vote the bums out! This meaningless bill probably has a bunch of earmarks that has everything to do with supporting pet projects that get these bums reelected. China's people don't vote on anything. We should stop importing their products. How can American companies compete with a coerced workforce?
Answered by Ransom - Tue Nov 10 06:57:26 2009
Can you support a bill that stops Social Security to illegal aliens?
Q. 'To amend title II of the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide prospectively that wages earned, and self-employment income derived, by individuals who are not citizens or nationals of the United States shall not be credited for coverage under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title, and to provide the President with authority to enter into agreements with other nations taking into account such limitation on crediting of wages and' Bill # H.R.160 Illegal aliens would be inelgiable for Social Security. Is this a good idea?? Social Security and illegal aliens --- Also the link down below will tell you more. The link in the main body will tell you what the bill says and… [cont.]
Asked by Joel W - Wed Jan 21 07:20:29 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. 'To amend title II of the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide prospectively that wages earned, and self-employment income derived, by individuals who are not citizens or nationals of the United States shall not be credited for coverage under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title, and to provide the President with authority to enter into agreements with other nations taking into account such limitation on crediting of wages and' Bill # H.R.160 Illegal aliens would be inelgiable for Social Security. Is this a good idea?? Social Security and illegal aliens --- Also the link down below will tell you more. The link in the main body will tell you what the bill says and… [cont.]
Asked by Joel W - Wed Jan 21 07:20:29 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
us government question needs some help i may know some but not. thanks?
Q. 95. A(n) ___ of the majority party chooses the Speaker of the House. 96. A(n) ___ is required for a legislative body to take official action. 97. ___ make sure that legislators are present for key votes. 98. The permanent committees of Congress are called ___ committees. 99. The United States has extended its boundaries through war, purchase, and ___. 100. ___ is often the cause of conflict between the poor and rich in society. 101. ___ has an unwritten constitution based on laws, court decisions, and customs. 102. ___ nations have advanced technology that provides a more comfortable life than developing nations do. 103. Japan s government is a(n) ___. 104. … [cont.]
Asked by Crissy - Tue Jan 27 23:57:43 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 128. the US Mint 132. pension i'm sure i know more answers, but come the f*uck on, who is going to read 50 questions and answer them all for you?
Answered by Danielle - Wed Jan 28 00:04:02 2009
Q. 95. A(n) ___ of the majority party chooses the Speaker of the House. 96. A(n) ___ is required for a legislative body to take official action. 97. ___ make sure that legislators are present for key votes. 98. The permanent committees of Congress are called ___ committees. 99. The United States has extended its boundaries through war, purchase, and ___. 100. ___ is often the cause of conflict between the poor and rich in society. 101. ___ has an unwritten constitution based on laws, court decisions, and customs. 102. ___ nations have advanced technology that provides a more comfortable life than developing nations do. 103. Japan s government is a(n) ___. 104. … [cont.]
Asked by Crissy - Tue Jan 27 23:57:43 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 128. the US Mint 132. pension i'm sure i know more answers, but come the f*uck on, who is going to read 50 questions and answer them all for you?
Answered by Danielle - Wed Jan 28 00:04:02 2009
What's Obama been up to between golf games and celebrity concerts?
Q. Did you see this? For Immediate Release June 10, 2010 Executive Order-- Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council executive order establishing the national prevention, health promotion, and public health council by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 4001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Establishment. There is established within the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council (Council). Sec. 2. Membership. (a) The Surgeon General shall serve as the Chair of… [cont.]
Asked by L.T.M. - Fri Jun 18 16:37:02 2010 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. My question, after reading all of this tax funded drivel, is this...why is our federal government taking over the job of our state social services? It's the job of our state-run social services agencies to promote healthy lifestyles & diseases through the literature that's available in all agency offices. This is duplicating what we already have available. So why are the Feds sticking their expensive noses into something that's none of their business? The purpose of the federal government is outlined in our Preamble to the U.S. Constitution. Promoting the general welfare doesn't mean that the Feds should be creating more bureaucracy. It means that they are to protect & defend our country from foreign powers. Each state is fully equipped to… [cont.]
Answered by Sandylynn - Fri Jun 18 19:02:35 2010
Q. Did you see this? For Immediate Release June 10, 2010 Executive Order-- Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council executive order establishing the national prevention, health promotion, and public health council by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 4001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Establishment. There is established within the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council (Council). Sec. 2. Membership. (a) The Surgeon General shall serve as the Chair of… [cont.]
Asked by L.T.M. - Fri Jun 18 16:37:02 2010 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. My question, after reading all of this tax funded drivel, is this...why is our federal government taking over the job of our state social services? It's the job of our state-run social services agencies to promote healthy lifestyles & diseases through the literature that's available in all agency offices. This is duplicating what we already have available. So why are the Feds sticking their expensive noses into something that's none of their business? The purpose of the federal government is outlined in our Preamble to the U.S. Constitution. Promoting the general welfare doesn't mean that the Feds should be creating more bureaucracy. It means that they are to protect & defend our country from foreign powers. Each state is fully equipped to… [cont.]
Answered by Sandylynn - Fri Jun 18 19:02:35 2010
Cyber Security Act of 2009?
Q. So I have seen a bit about the Cyber Security Act in Congress right now and after looking up the proposed bill I have to wonder why this is being seen as such a bad thing? "A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and for other purposes." "The bill would also give the President new authority to 'declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or… [cont.]
Asked by C - Mon Feb 15 19:52:52 2010 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I am all for it. The fact is that none of us right now have any security. Internet has not been regulated and ever since it became the major source for info, it has to have a major regulatory agency just like any other source of information. It is in fact the only unregulated media as of today. I've personally had to deal with this lack of security and my only recourse had been contacting the police who subsequently passed it on to the FBI. The FBI is so overloaded with complaints that by the time they would be able to get to my case, I would have probably forget all facts. This is how bad it gets, when things like that do not get properly regulated. Today, I am totally devastated.
Answered by Natalie - Mon Feb 15 20:05:47 2010
Q. So I have seen a bit about the Cyber Security Act in Congress right now and after looking up the proposed bill I have to wonder why this is being seen as such a bad thing? "A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and for other purposes." "The bill would also give the President new authority to 'declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or… [cont.]
Asked by C - Mon Feb 15 19:52:52 2010 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I am all for it. The fact is that none of us right now have any security. Internet has not been regulated and ever since it became the major source for info, it has to have a major regulatory agency just like any other source of information. It is in fact the only unregulated media as of today. I've personally had to deal with this lack of security and my only recourse had been contacting the police who subsequently passed it on to the FBI. The FBI is so overloaded with complaints that by the time they would be able to get to my case, I would have probably forget all facts. This is how bad it gets, when things like that do not get properly regulated. Today, I am totally devastated.
Answered by Natalie - Mon Feb 15 20:05:47 2010
How will America pay for the $108 billion IMF bailout for foreign banks?
Q. which was attached to the recent supplemental appropriations bill? See the story: "Senate Votes Support Hundred Billion Dollar Bailout of International Monetary Fund" To quote: "Washington, DC - Although the United States is drowning in debt, the Senate voted to included a $108 billion bailout for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the recent passage of S. 1054 - the 2009 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Senators voted 64-30 to reject an amendment offered by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C) that would have prevented the waste of billions of taxpayer dollars. Those who voted against the amendment voted to irresponsibly bail out foreign banks and governments at the expense of the American taxpayer. The administration might claim that… [cont.]
Asked by Ruby - Sat Jun 6 16:37:14 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There has to be some point...Just has to be where people start to catch on that these aren't simply bad decisions that our leaders are making, but rather an agenda with a ultimate goal...New World Order-one world government. Freedom lives only by the blood, sweat, and tears of the patriot, and the longer our nation continues down this path, the worse it will be for everyone when we finally step up and kick our den of Czars out of office. They are purposely sinking the USA into a financial hole we cannot recover from. This is how they are taking America away from Americans. Right now they are disregarding all the rules, and playing winner takes all.
Answered by Our future is history - Sat Jun 6 19:32:52 2009
Q. which was attached to the recent supplemental appropriations bill? See the story: "Senate Votes Support Hundred Billion Dollar Bailout of International Monetary Fund" To quote: "Washington, DC - Although the United States is drowning in debt, the Senate voted to included a $108 billion bailout for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the recent passage of S. 1054 - the 2009 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Senators voted 64-30 to reject an amendment offered by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C) that would have prevented the waste of billions of taxpayer dollars. Those who voted against the amendment voted to irresponsibly bail out foreign banks and governments at the expense of the American taxpayer. The administration might claim that… [cont.]
Asked by Ruby - Sat Jun 6 16:37:14 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There has to be some point...Just has to be where people start to catch on that these aren't simply bad decisions that our leaders are making, but rather an agenda with a ultimate goal...New World Order-one world government. Freedom lives only by the blood, sweat, and tears of the patriot, and the longer our nation continues down this path, the worse it will be for everyone when we finally step up and kick our den of Czars out of office. They are purposely sinking the USA into a financial hole we cannot recover from. This is how they are taking America away from Americans. Right now they are disregarding all the rules, and playing winner takes all.
Answered by Our future is history - Sat Jun 6 19:32:52 2009
Was the 2006 election the moment the government stopped listening to he people?
Q. TARP - the GM bailout - health care reform - now cap&trade and amnesty for illegals. The majority of the citizens oppose the majority of what the Democrats are doing. And for those who deny that there is an amnesty bill in Congress: Rep. Gutierrez Introduces Mass Amnesty Bill Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 4:47 PM EDT "Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) introduced legislation today that offers amnesty to the nation's estimated 11-18 million illegal aliens. The Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity Act (H.R. 4321) would increase annual immigration numbers while putting an end to many of the enforcement mechanisms currently put into place by federal, state and local governments. "H.R. 4321 would offer amnesty… [cont.]
Asked by gws35 - Wed Jun 30 13:28:25 2010 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would say 2000: === Debt added during George W. Bush's eight years: $5.5 trillion. 2 Wars, Medicare D = unfunded = DEBT / deficit 2 Financial Recessions/Meltdowns in 9 Years BP/Gulf Oil Disaster - GOP/Cheney cronyism started in 2001 GOP Congress 1994-2006 Bush POTUS 2000-2008 George W. Bush did NOT veto 1 single piece of spending legislation in 8 years - always vote smart, not blindly
Answered by FLSwampBoy - Wed Jun 30 13:31:20 2010
Q. TARP - the GM bailout - health care reform - now cap&trade and amnesty for illegals. The majority of the citizens oppose the majority of what the Democrats are doing. And for those who deny that there is an amnesty bill in Congress: Rep. Gutierrez Introduces Mass Amnesty Bill Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 4:47 PM EDT "Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) introduced legislation today that offers amnesty to the nation's estimated 11-18 million illegal aliens. The Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity Act (H.R. 4321) would increase annual immigration numbers while putting an end to many of the enforcement mechanisms currently put into place by federal, state and local governments. "H.R. 4321 would offer amnesty… [cont.]
Asked by gws35 - Wed Jun 30 13:28:25 2010 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would say 2000: === Debt added during George W. Bush's eight years: $5.5 trillion. 2 Wars, Medicare D = unfunded = DEBT / deficit 2 Financial Recessions/Meltdowns in 9 Years BP/Gulf Oil Disaster - GOP/Cheney cronyism started in 2001 GOP Congress 1994-2006 Bush POTUS 2000-2008 George W. Bush did NOT veto 1 single piece of spending legislation in 8 years - always vote smart, not blindly
Answered by FLSwampBoy - Wed Jun 30 13:31:20 2010
What Does bill H.R675 mean to everyone who lives in the US?
Q. This bill is being sneakily passed through the house/congress while everyone is busy with the Health Care debate. It gives the Department of Defenset (and civilian employees with the department of defense) the right to Carry Arms, serve civilian warrants, and make arrests on civilians. H.R.675 - To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. So basically anyone employed and given a postion within the government can execute any one of these with just a say-so from someone higher up. Isnt that scary the power this government is trying to give itself?
Asked by Touche' - Tue Mar 16 18:59:50 2010 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. This bill is being sneakily passed through the house/congress while everyone is busy with the Health Care debate. It gives the Department of Defenset (and civilian employees with the department of defense) the right to Carry Arms, serve civilian warrants, and make arrests on civilians. H.R.675 - To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. So basically anyone employed and given a postion within the government can execute any one of these with just a say-so from someone higher up. Isnt that scary the power this government is trying to give itself?
Asked by Touche' - Tue Mar 16 18:59:50 2010 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
What is up with this H.R.5741 slavery type bill being passed in congress people are freaking out about?
Q. H.R.5741 - Universal National Service Act H.R. 5741 is now being debated - 2 years of forced labor from everyone between 18 and 42 "H.R. 5741 is currently being argued in the house of representatives. If passed, H.R. 5741 will give the president the power to require 2 years of compulsory service from every US resident between ages 18 and 42. That's not a misprint: everyone between ages eighteen and forty-two will be required to serve in any capacity at the president's whim." H.R.5741 - Universal National Service Act To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland… [cont.]
Asked by !! - Tue Jul 27 13:16:03 2010 - - 20 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. H.R.5741 - Universal National Service Act H.R. 5741 is now being debated - 2 years of forced labor from everyone between 18 and 42 "H.R. 5741 is currently being argued in the house of representatives. If passed, H.R. 5741 will give the president the power to require 2 years of compulsory service from every US resident between ages 18 and 42. That's not a misprint: everyone between ages eighteen and forty-two will be required to serve in any capacity at the president's whim." H.R.5741 - Universal National Service Act To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland… [cont.]
Asked by !! - Tue Jul 27 13:16:03 2010 - - 20 Answers - 0 Comments
From Yahoo Answer Search: '111th United States Congress'
Fri Jul 30 02:58:36 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
news.google.com
BigNews.biz (press release)
After graduation, Barrett served four years in the United States Army, resigning his commission as Captain to return home and run the family furniture store ...
blog.aapg.org
343px x 300px | 20.90kB
[source page]
Scientists and engineers in the 111th Congress The 111th Congress of the United States of America convenes January 2009
opencongress.org
opencongress.org
ue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 GM
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for HR5483 To award a congressional gold medal to the . United States. Cadet Nurse Corps.
[Hide]▲
